<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Got Scooped</title>
	<link>http://great-hikes.com/blog/i-got-scooped/</link>
	<description>Living and hiking on the island of Kauai</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://great-hikes.com/blog/i-got-scooped/#comment-35353</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:27:02 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://great-hikes.com/blog/i-got-scooped/#comment-35353</guid>
					<description>I don't understand why everybody makes such a big issue out of the condition of the Kalalau trail. I hiked the trail in May of 07 and didn't really think it was that bad, you should see some of the popular trails here in Colorado. I understand wanting to fix up a few of the mudslide areas and dangerous crossings but a 2-3 foot wide graded trail the whole way? To me this seems very excessive. Isn't the inaccesability and remoteness a big part of the areas charm? I feel that making the trail too easy will bring a lot more people to the area and only increase the problems with crowding and garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t understand why everybody makes such a big issue out of the condition of the Kalalau trail. I hiked the trail in May of 07 and didn&#8217;t really think it was that bad, you should see some of the popular trails here in Colorado. I understand wanting to fix up a few of the mudslide areas and dangerous crossings but a 2-3 foot wide graded trail the whole way? To me this seems very excessive. Isn&#8217;t the inaccesability and remoteness a big part of the areas charm? I feel that making the trail too easy will bring a lot more people to the area and only increase the problems with crowding and garbage.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
